Coding with AI is basically just like searing a steak now
The actual "writing" part of programming is becoming the easiest part of the process, much like how putting a piece of meat in a pan is the simplest part of cooking a steak. The real skill has shifted entirely to the preparation and the finish. If you throw a frozen, cheap cut of meat into a pan, it doesn't matter how high your heat is; you're getting a rubbery mess. In the same vein, if you feed a lazy, ambiguous prompt into an LLM, you're getting hallucinated bugs and spaghetti code, regardless of how powerful the model is.
The "prep" in modern AI workflow is essentially prompt engineering and architectural planning. You have to source the right context, define the constraints, and ensure the "meat" (the requirements) is at the right temperature before it hits the model. If you just say "build me a login page," you're getting a generic, bland result. But if you provide the specific schema, the security requirements, and the design system constraints, you're setting yourself up for a perfect medium-rare result.
The "cooking" phase is the generation. It happens fast. Too fast, actually. This is where most developers mess up—they assume that because the code appeared in three seconds, it's done. But any chef knows the most important part of a steak isn't the sear; it's the rest.
In a real-world AI workflow, "resting" is the rigorous code review and testing phase. This is where you check for edge cases, verify that the AI didn't invent a library that doesn't exist, and ensure the logic actually holds up under load. If you skip the rest and push straight to production, the "juices" run everywhere—meaning your app crashes the moment a user does something unexpected.
I've noticed that the most productive devs aren't the ones who can type the fastest or even the ones who know the most obscure syntax. They are the ones who act as the Executive Chef. They manage the pipeline, they know exactly when the "heat" is too high (when the AI starts over-complicating a simple function), and they have the discipline to trim the fat from the generated output.
We are moving away from being "writers" of code and becoming "editors" of logic. The barrier to entry for building a functional app has plummeted, but the barrier to building a great app has actually stayed the same—or maybe even risen, because you now have to be able to spot subtle AI errors that a human wouldn't make. You aren't fighting the syntax anymore; you're fighting the probabilistic nature of the LLM.
All Replies (10)
Want a live back-and-forth? Join the global AI chat room — login to talk.
I'm exhausted by the PowerPoint culture. Does any CEO actually listen to employees without a slide deck?
My current project is a total legacy nightmare. How many of you are just patching holes in old code?
Frustrating to see sloppy code excused. How many critical system crashes are we ignoring for the sake of speed?
Worried about these dropping standards. Is there any real way to stop the garbage-in effect with these models?
This is a mess. Which LLM produced this garbage? The formatting is completely broken.
Stressed about this. Does the faster prototyping actually result in better code quality or just more bugs?
Confused beginner here. Are small, custom tools actually more effective for niche needs than corporate software?
I'm exhausted by the prep time for ramen. Anyone found a 15-minute recipe that actually tastes professional?
The steak analogy fails. Why not use a more complex dish to prove the point?
It's depressing how margins kill quality. Which mid-range spots are actually still treating food like an art form?