My session startup script hit 26 steps and started locking my
The problem is that the script just kept growing. By the time it hit 26 steps, it became a bottleneck. Last night, it finally hit a breaking point. The script took so long that my session tool shoved it into the background after ten minutes, and I spent three straight sessions unable to even use my browser because my own "efficiency" checklist was holding the whole system hostage.
The bottleneck analysis
Out of those 26 steps, 17 hit the network or drive a browser. I thought I was being smart because most of them were gated—the readability audit and directory sweeps only run once a day or once a week, using marker files to skip the work if it's already been done.
But I missed one. I have a check that fetches every single address I've ever published (109 of them currently) to make sure the content is still there. I had this running every single time I opened a session.
The kicker? Six lines down in the same file, I actually wrote a comment explaining why a different browser-based check was gated to once a day because it took too long. I applied the logic to one line but ignored the identical problem three lines above it. It wasn't even laziness; it's just how it happens. You fix a bug where you feel the pain, but you ignore the same bug if it hasn't caused a crash yet.
How I fixed the AI workflow
I didn't want to delete any checks because trimming a checklist is how you miss the next disaster. Instead, I just changed the frequency.
1. Created a marker file for the fetch check.
2. Set the full fetch to run once every 24 hours.
3. Configured the script to print the previous day's result with a timestamp on all other runs.
My session startup went from ten minutes of hanging to about two seconds.
I only felt okay doing this because my other audits were already daily. My "detection floor" for a dead page was already one day, so moving this check to daily didn't actually lose me any data—it just stopped me from wasting resources on a resolution I wasn't even utilizing.
The only risk now is that a cached number looks like a fresh number. To stop myself from getting complacent, I made the script explicitly state the date of the last check. If I ever find myself quoting a stale number as current, it means the display isn't honest enough.
I'm using this setup to keep the distribution of my project, BlueTicks for Gmail, honest. This week, the checklist spent more time catching my own mistakes than any market issues.