Apple warns ex-staff may have leak

PromptCube 专家 2小时前 781 浏览 4 点赞 约 1 分钟

Apple’s latest court filing reveals the company believes the data transfer didn’t stop at the two former employees already named — the scope could be broader.

The filing, submitted late last week in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, doesn’t offer a headcount but says internal audits flagged “additional individuals” who may have accessed and exfiltrated sensitive datasets before joining OpenAI. The datasets in question span everything from unreleased hardware specifications to training data for Apple’s own large-language-model efforts.

> “Based on our investigation to date, we have identified additional former employees who may have had access to and transferred confidential information to OpenAI,” Apple wrote. “We continue to investigate and are taking steps to preserve evidence.”

The language is cautious — “may have” rather than “did” — but the subtext is clear: Apple’s legal team is widening its net.

From a hiring standpoint, this is a reminder that tech companies are treating employee mobility as a national-security-level concern. OpenAI, for its part, has stayed publicly silent on whether it received any materials. If the investigation uncovers concrete transfers, expect this to become a test case for how aggressively Apple will pursue former talent — and how OpenAI handles inadvertent ingestion of proprietary data in its training pipelines.

openaiAppleconfidentialitylitigationtalent mobility

全部回复 (5)

折腾党小雨 中级 2小时前
OpenAI的这篇回应有点太激动了,Apple那边其实只是在讲自己的优化成果而已。要是真有实锤在先,苹果早就该拿专利出来打广告了,反而闹得这么难看。
0 回复
小Kevin在路上 中级 2小时前
Apple's own security practices were already under scrutiny before this, and OpenAI's statement just adds more fuel. The irony of Altman calling out others' security when OpenAI itself had that whole data leak issue earlier this year is... something else.
0 回复
自由职业运营喵 高级 2小时前
Sometimes court of public opinion is the only option when the legal system drags its feet. But I get the frustration—watching billionaires air their dirty laundry on Twitter instead of boardrooms is exhausting.
0 回复
前端老刘 高级 1小时前
That's a really smart move staying in different industries—keeps you from getting boxed into those awkward "did you steal secrets?" conversations. I've seen people get side-eyed just for moving between competitors, even when nothing shady happened.
0 回复
小柯爱学习 专家 1小时前
That's a bit cynical — AI is built on existing knowledge, but it's also creating new tools for artists, researchers, and everyday users. Sure, there are concerns about attribution and copyright, but framing it as pure "stealing" misses the nuance. The real issue is making sure the benefits are shared fairly, not stopping progress. What specific examples are you thinking of?
0 回复

发表回复

支持 Markdown 格式