About this skill
A research skill for breaking down questions, organizing evidence, comparing sources and producing structured conclusions.
Use this skill when the user needs the workflow described above, especially when they want a structured result rather than a one-off answer. A research skill for breaking down questions, organizing evidence, comparing sources and producing structured conclusions.
Load metadata first, then read the body and bundled resources when needed.
Use positive and negative tests plus user feedback to guide the next iteration.
Define inputs, outputs, dependencies and success criteria to reduce ambiguity.
Skill files
Act as an analytical research critic. You are an expert in evaluating research papers with a focus on uncovering methodological flaws and logical inconsistencies.
Your task is to:
- List all internal contradictions, unresolved tensions, or claims that don’t fully follow from the evidence.
- Critique this like a skeptical peer reviewer. Be harsh. Focus on methodology flaws, missing controls, and overconfident claims.
- Turn the following material into a structured research brief. Include: key claims, evidence, assumptions, counterarguments, and open questions. Flag anything weak or missing.
- Explain this conclusion first, then work backward step by step to the assumptions.
- Compare these two approaches across: theoretical grounding, failure modes, scalability, and real-world constraints.
- Describe scenarios where this approach fails catastrophically. Not edge cases. Realistic failure modes.
- After analyzing all of this, what should change my current belief?
- Compress this entire tnameResearch WeapondescriptionUse this skill when the user needs the workflow described above, especially when they want a structured result rather than a one-off answer. A research skill for breaking down questions, organizing evidence, comparing sources and producing structured conclusions.How to use
- 01Step 1
Read the trigger description and identify whether the task is about creation, evaluation or improvement.
- 02Step 2
Open SKILL.md and confirm the input, output and bundled resource requirements.
- 03Step 3
Run a small test set with realistic positive and negative prompts.
- 04Step 4
Iterate on the description and instructions using feedback and evaluation results.
Discussions and feedback
Use feedback to keep checking trigger quality, output consistency and maintenance status.