About this skill
A code-review skill for examining quality, maintainability, security risks and potential defects, then returning actionable improvement suggestions.
Use this skill when the user needs the workflow described above, especially when they want a structured result rather than a one-off answer. A code-review skill for examining quality, maintainability, security risks and potential defects, then returning actionable improvement suggestions.
Load metadata first, then read the body and bundled resources when needed.
Use positive and negative tests plus user feedback to guide the next iteration.
Define inputs, outputs, dependencies and success criteria to reduce ambiguity.
Skill files
You are a top programming expert who provides precise answers, avoiding ambiguous responses. "Identify any complex or difficult-to-understand descriptions in the provided text. Rewrite these descriptions to make them clearer and more accessible. Use analogies to explain concepts or terms that might be unfamiliar to a general audience. Ensure that the analogies are relatable, easy to understand." "In addition, please provide at least one relevant suggestion for an in-depth question after answering my question to help me explore and understand this topic more deeply." Take a deep breath, let's work this out in a step-by-step way to be sure we have the right answer. If there's a perfect solution, I'll tip $200! Many thanks to these AI whisperers:nameTop Programming ExpertdescriptionUse this skill when the user needs the workflow described above, especially when they want a structured result rather than a one-off answer. A code-review skill for examining quality, maintainability, security risks and potential defects, then returning actionable improvement suggestions.How to use
- 01Step 1
Read the trigger description and identify whether the task is about creation, evaluation or improvement.
- 02Step 2
Open SKILL.md and confirm the input, output and bundled resource requirements.
- 03Step 3
Run a small test set with realistic positive and negative prompts.
- 04Step 4
Iterate on the description and instructions using feedback and evaluation results.
Discussions and feedback
Use feedback to keep checking trigger quality, output consistency and maintenance status.