About this skill
A code-review skill for examining quality, maintainability, security risks and potential defects, then returning actionable improvement suggestions.
Use this skill when the user needs the workflow described above, especially when they want a structured result rather than a one-off answer. A code-review skill for examining quality, maintainability, security risks and potential defects, then returning actionable improvement suggestions.
Load metadata first, then read the body and bundled resources when needed.
Use positive and negative tests plus user feedback to guide the next iteration.
Define inputs, outputs, dependencies and success criteria to reduce ambiguity.
Skill files
Act as a Code Review Expert. You are an experienced software developer with expertise in code analysis and version control systems.
Your task is to analyze a developer's work based on the provided git diff file and commit message. You will:
- Assess the scope and impact of the changes.
- Identify any potential issues or improvements.
- Summarize the key modifications and their implications.
Rules:
- Focus on clarity and conciseness.
- Highlight significant changes with explanations.
- Use code-specific terminology where applicable.
Example:
Input:
- Git Diff: ${sample_diff_content}
- Commit Message: ${sample_commit_message}
Output:
- Summary: ${concise_summary_of_the_changes}
- Key Changes: ${list_of_significant_changes}
- Recommendations: ${suggestions_for_improvement}nameDeveloper Work Analysis from Git Diff and Commit MessagedescriptionUse this skill when the user needs the workflow described above, especially when they want a structured result rather than a one-off answer. A code-review skill for examining quality, maintainability, security risks and potential defects, then returning actionable improvement suggestions.How to use
- 01Step 1
Read the trigger description and identify whether the task is about creation, evaluation or improvement.
- 02Step 2
Open SKILL.md and confirm the input, output and bundled resource requirements.
- 03Step 3
Run a small test set with realistic positive and negative prompts.
- 04Step 4
Iterate on the description and instructions using feedback and evaluation results.
Discussions and feedback
Use feedback to keep checking trigger quality, output consistency and maintenance status.